The Problem of Predecessors on Spanning Trees
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14311/1364Keywords:
loop erased random walk, spanning trees, Kirchhoff theorem, Abelian sandpile modelAbstract
We consider the equiprobable distribution of spanning trees on the square lattice. All bonds of each tree can be oriented uniquely with respect to an arbitrary chosen site called the root. The problem of predecessors is to find the probability that a path along the oriented bonds passes sequentially fixed sites i and j. The conformal field theory for the Potts model predicts the fractal dimension of the path to be 5/4. Using this result, we show that the probability in the predecessors problem for two sites separated by large distance r decreases as P(r) ∼ r −3/4. If sites i and j are nearest neighbors on the square lattice, the probability P(1) = 5/16 can be found from the analytical theory developed for the sandpile model. The known equivalence between the loop erased random walk (LERW) and the directed path on the spanning tree states that P(1) is the probability for the LERW started at i to reach the neighboring site j. By analogy with the self-avoiding walk, P(1) can be called the return probability. Extensive Monte-Carlo simulations confirm the theoretical predictions.Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
4. ddd